|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Sam/COMMISSIONER) on Aug 10, 2011 10:41:55 GMT -5
Well, I would much rather have seperate MLB and MiLB drafts. 3 rounds does sound good, but remember, there are only 24 picks per round. There will be around 150 active players throughout the 6 teams in the MLB draft. They might not be the best players, but you could get average players in the 2-3 round. As for the MiLB draft, I will put together a list of the best minor league players and try to get every player in the teams system on the list.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yankees GM (Donald) on Aug 10, 2011 11:59:58 GMT -5
I think you should keep it one. That way a team like the Rangers may not get a top Superstar but can get a top prospect so it will keep them interested.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Sam/COMMISSIONER) on Aug 10, 2011 12:02:14 GMT -5
If we keep it one draft, then we should have 4 rounds, and have the rest be free agents. There are a ton of minor league players throughout the 6 teams.
|
|
|
|
Post by Yankees GM (Donald) on Aug 10, 2011 12:04:14 GMT -5
Thats fine. Four rounds can work if its combined.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex/Co-Commish) on Aug 10, 2011 21:02:12 GMT -5
I don't know if all the drafts should be going with the worst team first... It wouldn't be fair... The top teams would be getting lesser players while the top teams would get 2 maybe three great guys... along with 2 top prospects? Somethings gotta even out. Maybe like worst teams pick first in the 1st - 3rd. Best teams pick first 4th and 5th. Then 6th through 8th for worst and then 9th and 10th for best.... same for the prospects... maybe 1st and 2nd, and 3rd and 4th though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Indians GM (Ed) on Aug 10, 2011 21:43:29 GMT -5
i think we should do a normal draft, the talent range between the last team and first place team is a big margin, even if you picked last your first player would be better than the worst teams's second player so its not that big when you bring the talent level of different teams into effect, now obviuosly im biased towards this way while you are to the other but i do think this is the best way
|
|
|
|
Post by Royals GM (Zack) on Aug 10, 2011 22:10:19 GMT -5
Snake rounds 1 and 2the and make 3 and 4 normal
|
|
|
|
Post by Yankees GM (Donald) on Aug 11, 2011 8:55:41 GMT -5
I don't know if all the drafts should be going with the worst team first... It wouldn't be fair... The top teams would be getting lesser players while the top teams would get 2 maybe three great guys... along with 2 top prospects? Somethings gotta even out. Maybe like worst teams pick first in the 1st - 3rd. Best teams pick first 4th and 5th. Then 6th through 8th for worst and then 9th and 10th for best.... same for the prospects... maybe 1st and 2nd, and 3rd and 4th though. The draft should be a normal four round draft. The teams at the end can choose a prospect, best available or not pick. Thats like the Packers saying "Even though we won the SB, we should have a top 3 pick because the players we can get at 32 are worse than top 4." The point of a draft is to give the worst team the shot at the best players. |
|
|
|
Post by Mets GM (Chris) on Aug 11, 2011 9:12:21 GMT -5
You know what if a team picking 20 + wants a lower pick then trade for it if Sam wants I'll set it up and keep track of it like the other draft....
Also cause a team might have traded a draft pick befor and now that team is gone I think this up coming draft you still get the pick but it will be at the end of the draft .... What does everyone say?
|
|
|
|
Post by Blue Jays GM (Steve) on Aug 12, 2011 6:00:55 GMT -5
I don't know if all the drafts should be going with the worst team first... It wouldn't be fair... The top teams would be getting lesser players while the top teams would get 2 maybe three great guys... along with 2 top prospects? Somethings gotta even out. Maybe like worst teams pick first in the 1st - 3rd. Best teams pick first 4th and 5th. Then 6th through 8th for worst and then 9th and 10th for best.... same for the prospects... maybe 1st and 2nd, and 3rd and 4th though. The draft should be a normal four round draft. The teams at the end can choose a prospect, best available or not pick. Thats like the Packers saying "Even though we won the SB, we should have a top 3 pick because the players we can get at 32 are worse than top 4." The point of a draft is to give the worst team the shot at the best players. Thank you, Yanks!! Well said. The idea of being able to trade these picks is a good idea, Mets. |
|
|
|
Post by raysgm on Aug 12, 2011 7:16:18 GMT -5
Sam: I say the 4 teams not returning we should put there MLB players into free agents .... Only have a draft for there minor league system , and if a team don't want anyone then they can put pass when it's there turn to draft.... The only reason why I say put them into free agents is because the teams really didn't do a good job of keeping there contracts ... I like this idea too, because then the teams w/less cap utilized are probably the worse teams and this gives them the opportunity to get better. |
|
|
|
Post by Yankees GM (Donald) on Aug 12, 2011 11:20:29 GMT -5
Draft is still better. Let the worse teams pick first because if not then we have the debacle like last year where people are bidding 40M per for a player then quitting a few weeks in.
|
|
|
|
Post by Twins GM (Nathan) on Aug 15, 2011 18:43:23 GMT -5
Draft is still better. Let the worse teams pick first because if not then we have the debacle like last year where people are bidding 40M per for a player then quitting a few weeks in. This. If we have another debacle like last year I'm walking away. |
|
|
|
Post by raysgm on Aug 15, 2011 19:28:41 GMT -5
Use reverse order of the end of the season power rankings to make the draft order.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rockies GM (Alex/Co-Commish) on Aug 16, 2011 9:00:34 GMT -5
I guess it's all good.
|
|
