|
Post by Brewers GM (Sam/COMMISSIONER) on Nov 25, 2010 17:14:51 GMT -5
On Fantrax it lets me change player positions, so i can change someone's position. I dont want to make every player a DH, because that would take days. So, before the season starts, i will change your designated hitter's primary position if he is not eligible for DH.
|
|
|
Post by khill4475 on Nov 25, 2010 17:21:42 GMT -5
There's got to be a way to make every player available at DH without having to change each player individually.
|
|
|
Post by lftyg33 on Nov 25, 2010 17:26:10 GMT -5
is there a UTIL position that all players would be eligible for?
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Sam/COMMISSIONER) on Nov 25, 2010 17:30:43 GMT -5
rays- i have checked. no luck, but will keep looking. mariners- yes, every batter is eligible for the utility position
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals GM (Travis) on Nov 25, 2010 18:09:54 GMT -5
rays- i have checked. no luck, but will keep looking. mariners- yes, every batter is eligible for the utility position So then just turn DH in UTIL
|
|
|
Post by lftyg33 on Nov 25, 2010 19:36:15 GMT -5
rays- i have checked. no luck, but will keep looking. mariners- yes, every batter is eligible for the utility position So then just turn DH in UTIL exactly
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM (Sam/COMMISSIONER) on Nov 25, 2010 19:57:54 GMT -5
So then just turn DH in UTIL exactly Then we would have 2 utilities right? What about our IF and OF positions though. Do we have them or not?
|
|
|
Post by Indians GM (Ed) on Nov 25, 2010 20:13:02 GMT -5
yeah just change dh to util
|
|
|
Post by forum199 on Nov 25, 2010 20:28:52 GMT -5
thats not fair at all, I paid ALOT to get a DH in Luke SCott
|
|
|
Post by forum199 on Nov 25, 2010 20:29:58 GMT -5
I had to give up Brett Jackson + Jay Jackson because Scott's DH eligibility made him such a premium player, if Scott is just a normal OF, I wouldn't eevn CONSIDER giving up two of my top 5 prospects to get him
|
|
|
Post by Indians GM (Ed) on Nov 25, 2010 20:42:44 GMT -5
yeah i see what the cubs mean, it would be unfair maybe just have everyone give you one player to put in the DH you could switch for them
|
|
|
Post by khill4475 on Nov 25, 2010 23:05:11 GMT -5
I think we should eliminate INF, OF and just make it like a real lineup, with a DH/UTIL.
|
|
|
Post by forum199 on Nov 25, 2010 23:15:11 GMT -5
agreed w/ rays
|
|
|
Post by Cardinals GM (Travis) on Nov 25, 2010 23:15:30 GMT -5
You guys, we had the DH spot last year that could only be occupied by true DHs. This wasn't fair because only AL teams have DH. So last year commish agreed that all players would be DH eligible. Now he can't do that so he's making it a utility player. This was all discussed and agrees to last year.
|
|
|
Post by forum199 on Nov 26, 2010 13:54:18 GMT -5
yes, but accordingly, some NL teams like myself paid UP THE ASS to acquire a DH from the AL....I wouldn't be down for this, unless I was allowed to reverse my luke scott trade (thus getting back brett jackson, jay jackson, and dj lamahieu for him) or given a couple of supplemental first rounders, because it's not fair to change the rules in the middle of the game if it screws over a particular team/group of teams...
|
|